Thursday, October 31, 2013

Google smartwatch is almost here


  • google-now-for-iphone-ipad.jpg
    Google's forthcoming smartwatch, which will run on Android, will be integrated with Google Now, the company's intelligent personal assistant that can answer questions, make recommendations and predict what information users need based on what they are doing. (GOOGLE)
Google's smartwatch is in late-stage development and the company is in talks with Asian suppliers to begin mass production of the device, people familiar with the matter said.
The new device, which will run on Android, will be integrated with Google Now, the company's intelligent personal assistant that can answer questions, make recommendations and predict what information users need based on what they are doing, a person familiar with the situation said. Google has also been working to reduce power consumption on the smartwatch so it won't require frequent battery charges, the person said.
The smartwatch will be able to communicate with other devices such as a smartphone, and draw information such as travel schedules from a user's email through Google Now, the person said. The device could be ready for mass production within months, the person said.
With its wristwatch, Google is aiming to address two criticisms of smartwatches that skeptics have long made: usefulness and battery life. While several smartwatches are on the market already, including one from Samsung, they have yet to gain a widespread following as they still have limited functions and a relatively high price. However, analysts say that with the development of improved applications, wearable devices will become increasingly mainstream and a growing battleground for tech industry heavyweights like Google and Apple. Annual sales of wearable devices are projected to reach 485 million units by 2018, according to market-research firm ABI Research.
For Google, the launch of a wristwatch would be an effort to secure a leading position in the growing wearable devices sector following its development of Google Glass. It would also be a play to keep users in its Android ecosystem and out of competing systems from Apple and Microsoft.

My so-called robo-life: Robopresence makes debut at tech conference


  • Beam at RoboBusiness 1.jpg
    Telepresence robots -- essentially Skype machines that you can wheel around -- attend a conference on robobusiness in California. (SUITABLE TECHNOLOGIES)
  • Beam at RoboBusiness 3.jpg
    Here's what you'll see in your laptop -- the control window for a Beam telepresence robot, showing the world in front of you and a few controls for your robot. (FOXNEWS.COM / JOHN BRANDON)
  • Beam at RoboBusiness 2.jpg
    The view from my laptop as robot meets robot at the RoboBusiness conference in Santa Clara, California. (FOXNEWS.COM / JOHN BRANDON)
I bumped into someone recently. Admittedly, I wasn’t watching where I was going -- in fact, I was heading for the food table. The person who brushed against me wasn’t paying attention, either. In fact, it wasn’t really a person at all. It was a robot.
I was too.
I was controlling the Beam remote-presence device at the RoboBusiness conference in Santa Clara last week. The person who brushed against me was also controlling a Beam. There were approximately 50 robopresence operators in attendance there, along with a few hundred “real” humans.
The Beam is essentially a Skype bot with wheels -- a giant screen with your face that you drive around. You can maneuver it easily from across the room or around the world, spinning 360 degrees and driving around the room. The robot has enough juice for about eight hours; when you first start operating one, you pull away from a charger like you’re disconnecting an iPhone.
I took my laptop to a local school to demo the Beam. I’ve never seen teenagers so attentive.
On my laptop, I could see a wide-angle view of the surroundings thanks to its camera. There’s a large forward view in the Beam app for Windows or Mac, plus a second camera that shows my view of the floor to help with tighter navigation. The app provides sliders for my voice and volume on the left and my face to the right. There isn’t a laser that encourages people to get out of my way yet, however.
In the morning, the conference started with a “Beam only” event. I ventured onto the eerily vacant showfloor. At one of the first booths, for the Neato robotic vacuum, I zoomed in for a closer look. Several companies, like the Australian think-tank CSIRO, were happy to demo augmented reality goggles for me, although I could not try them on (I'm a robot, remember?). To snap business cards, I asked the presenter to show their card to the camera. Smile, and say future tech!
Around midday, I took my laptop to a school in Minnesota to demo the Beam robot in California. I’ve never seen teenagers so attentive. A few controlled the robot. At the Unbounded Robotics booth, the exhibitor didn’t bother to get up out of her chair. “Are you ten years old?” she asked one of the teens running the robot. Another student tried to ask a robot out on a date -- it was an epic fail.
Back at the helm that afternoon, I met Scott Hassan, the founder of Beam. He explained how the Beam could be used to further remote communication. 
“Imagine having five different Beams you control at five different tech conferences!” he told me. At CES in 2015, he hopes to have 10,000 Beams available for virtual attendees. He said reporters could use them to enter war-torn areas as well. Someday, you could hire low-cost human operators to do virtual research.
Before my event started, I tried to arrange meet-ups with people in California not connected to RoboBusiness. A few were interested at first until they realized I would be there only as a robot. Of the three meetings I had arranged, two dropped out at the last minute. One, the founder of a social networking start-up called Addvocate, did drive down to meet me.
“This is just as awkward as I imagined,” he said. The founder, Marcus Nelson, explained how his service works -- it’s a business tool to manage a brand -- but later explained how he thought robopresence removed a human element. Without handshakes or the realization that you are in the presence of a carbon lifeform, it might not last, he said.
Indeed, as the event “rolled” on, a few of the booth exhibitors brushed aside my questions if there was a human standing nearby. I estimated that my Beam was about 50 percent human, with a voice and a face and physical movement and sight, but it was nothing like a human presence. When my bot bumped into real people, they rarely said excuse me. I also had no success at that food table.
Deciding to venture a bit further, I went to the Beam booth, where there were attractive female attendants controlling Beams. I asked one to bring me out to the convention hall. 
“Sure, just follow me! If your Beam gets a little wonky, just head on back,” she said in a chipper voice, referring to the fact that the Beam connects over Wi-Fi in a limited area.
We rolled out of the expo and into a foyer. In my most surreal moment, following behind her through a crowd of gawkers, we stopped at a window and looked out at the California sunshine -- just two robots, enjoying the view. At the UPS store nearby, I asked the clerk if he could box me up and send me home. That didn’t go over well.
Does the Beam have a future? I think so. The main limitation is that the bot works only in a limited space. It weighs 100 pounds, so transporting it is a challenge. The Beam can’t snap photos or record video either, which is a bit surprising. Also, it costs about $16,000. People tend to ignore a Beam if the operator is in a dark room; good lighting and sound helps. But, my main complaint is this: There’s no iPad app, so you’re stuck with a clunky old laptop controller.
I will use one again. The cost savings and travel is one thing, but the Beam also saved me time and allowed me to work easily during down times. Most important, I collected roughly the same information I would have collected in person -- the ultimate robowin.

How Facebook can tell a break-up is coming before you do


  • facebook-dating.jpg
    NEWS.COM.AU / REUTERS
Facebook can predict when you're going to break up. 
Yes, apparently the fate of your relationship is not written in the stars but in your social circle.
Cornell University researcher Jon Kleinberg and Facebook senior engineer Lars Backstrom proved as much when they presented their co-written research paper at a social computing conference in February.
The researchers took the datasets of 1.3 million Facebook users listed as being in a relationship, and found that the more well connected their mutual friends were, the more likely they were to break up.
This theory is described as dispersion.
Couples with high dispersion have mutual friends who are not well connected.
Couples with low dispersion have mutual friends who are well connected.
Therefore the Facebook theory suggests if you and your partner share the same social circle on Facebook (low dispersion), you're less likely to have your own lives and therefore the relationship is more likely to implode.
A healthy relationship, according to Facebook, is one where both partners have connections to a lot of different groups of people, even if those friendships aren't particularly strong.
"Instead of embededness, we propose that the link between and an individual u and v his or her partner should display a 'dispersed' structure: the mutual neighbours of u and v are not well connected to one another and hence u and v act jointly as the only intermediaries between these different parts of the network," the researchers wrote in the study.
In a nutshell, get your own damn lives and friends.
Of course, this algorithm might not take into account the fact that some couples don't take their social circles on Facebook particularly seriously and therefore might look like they don't have as wide group of friends when they actually do.
Probably because they are out living their lives.

Is your gadget making you sick?


Put down your PC -- it could make you sick.
New York Magazine has put together a list of gadget-related illnesses, and once you read it, you'll never look at a computer virus the same way again. One the site highlights: a Mayo Clinic report that smartphone and tablet use can cause sleep deprivation due to their bright lights, which inhibit the body from entering sleep correctly. 
Then there’s nomophobia, which 66 percent of people apparently suffer from. For those afflicted, the thought of even a prosaic bathroom trip sans smartphone can cause separation anxiety, with symptoms like trembling, sweating, and nausea. does that sound like you?
Next! A wristband that monitors nearly everything you do. The Airo wristband from Airo Health launched yesterday and, according to engadget.com, claims to track your heart rate, workout intensity, sleep patterns and nutritional intake. I’m still waiting for the one that will measure how many words you utter a day. I know a few people who should slice that in half.

Finally! A common sense media study found that 38 percent of children under 2 years old use mobile media to watch videos and play games. Smartphones are like a built in babysitter for parents. Mashable.com said that children under 8 are using these gadgets for an average of 15 minutes per day.  Whereas baby boomers either refuse to embrace them or attend Apple’s how-to classes, rather than asking their tech savvy kids for help ... I'm looking at you, mom!
You've had your megabyte.  See you later techies!

With the new Apple iPad Air, size now matters


Until now, size wasn't the deciding factor between the full-size Apple iPad Air and the iPad mini. There were marked differences between the two such as size, weight, speed and quality of display.
But the latest generation of tablets from Apple -- the iPad Air goes on sale this Friday, the Mini shortly thereafter -- are both best in class: same speed, same camera same ultrahigh definition Retina display. So when you're deciding between the two … size makes all the difference.
In my house, the kids are the real gadget testers. Since they take over any tablet or phone I bring home, we joined forces to put the new Air through the Morris Family paces for the last week.
In my house, the kids are the real gadget testers.
At 1 pound, the new iPad Air is impressively light, barely heavier than the iPad mini. My toddler can waddle around the house with it a lot more easily, and I can now use it in bed without worrying that it will smack me in the forehead if I doze off while reading Frank Miller’s "The Dark Knight Returns." Which has been known to happen with the previous generation iPad.
It’s hard to believe Apple managed to shave nearly a half-pound off last year’s fourth-generation iPad while still maintaining exceptional battery life, which in my all-day usage rarely dropped below 30 percent.
Battery life is an important feature in my house. My children like to play Wood Puzzles HD and then leave the game on for the music as background noise while they play. And I leave the house at 3:30 a.m. for FOX & Friends, iPad in tow, so I need it to last me all day. Like previous generations, the Air does just fine on this count.
Yet the Air is now a lot thinner -- 20 percent thinner than the previous generation, to be exact. It's great for travel in my own backpack, as well as in the diaper bag. You barely notice it’s there.
The Retina display does not fail to impress. I found it all the more impressive given my recent Lasik eye surgery. The screen resolution is crystal clear. Apple reduced the bezel around the sides to give the appearance of more "screen" even though the viewing area remains the same as last year’s iPad.
Taking aim at both Google and Microsoft, Apple’s throwing in a bunch of free software when you buy the new iPad. iPhoto, iMovie, GarageBand, Pages, Numbers and Keynote are all now free. Microsoft still doesn’t offer Office for the iPad, you’ll have to buy a Surface tablet if you want it. Microsoft clearly missed the boat on this one.
My biggest disappointment with the Pad Air is the lack of Touch ID, Apple’s fingerprint sensor. Once you use it you’ll never want to peck out a passcode again. I see Touch ID as one of the most important technological breakthroughs of 2013. It’s both a testament to how well it works on the iPhone 5s and how difficult the technology was to pull off for one product, let alone two different iPad sizes. Apple sells millions more iPhones than they do iPads, so it’s no wonder Touch ID didn’t make it onto the tablets. Still, I’m disappointed.
And now to the two questions I’ve already received the most: Should I upgrade if I have an older iPad? Should I get the iPad Air or the smaller iPad Mini? Lets take one at a time.
Should you upgrade? Well that depends on which iPad you’ve got. Existing iPad owners can upgrade to iOS 7, the latest mobile operating system that the iPad Air runs. And this is a great operating system! It makes older iPads and iPhones seem new. But if you’ve been itching for a Retina display or find your older iPad really breaking your back, this is the upgrade for you.
Should you choose the Air or the Mini? Once again, it all boils down to size. They have the same storage capacity, the same speed processor, the same operating system. So do you like 'em big? That’s a personal question I really can’t help you with.

Objection! “Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Dual Destinies” review


  • Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney 2.jpg
    A character from the video game Ace Attorney: Phoenix Wright Dual Destinies. (CAPCOM)
  • Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney 1.jpg
  • Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney.jpg
    A character from the video game Ace Attorney: Phoenix Wright Dual Destinies. (CAPCOM)
Tired of the same grungy first person shooters and yearly sports games? Looking for something different for the bus ride to work? The latest installment of the ever-fresh “Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney” franchise may appeal -- but those with little patience for lots of dialogue may raise an objection.
“Ace Attorney: Phoenix Wright – Dual Destinies” has just been released for the Nintendo 3DS, but unless you're a regular browser of video game sites, you may have missed it.
“Dual Destinies” hasn’t been heavily advertised, and isn’t even being released in games stores anytime soon; instead the game is being sold solely via the 3DS’s eShop. Capcom told FoxNews.com that this is in order to get the game over sooner to Western audiences, but it also means it would be very easy for the casual gamer to miss this, the fifth installment of the legal franchise that began in 2001 on the Game Boy Advance.
Which would be a shame. Over the years the series of visual novel/adventure games have developed a devoted fan base, and for a good reason. They're fresh and lots of fun.
The series focuses on a hotshot attorney by the name of Phoenix Wright, and his eccentric legal team. The game places the player into his shoes, or the shoes of one of his colleagues, as he wages his courtroom battles defending the innocent and prosecuting the wicked.
Studying the testimony of a witness, examining their emotions and comparing their narrative with the evidence ... is deliciously satisfying.
Although a perhaps dry sounding concept, the reality is quite different. The Japanese series has never sought authenticity as its goal, and therefore plays fast and loose with legal procedure in order to squeak the most fun out of cases, which frequently delve into the bizarre.
So for instance in “Dual Destinies,” in one of the first cases you will face off against a lawyer who himself has been convicted for murder, and threatens the judge and opposition attorneys with his sword and his pet eagle -- who attacks witnesses and hovers over the judge menacingly.
Gameplay is part interactive novel and part adventure. You must investigate the case, exploring environments, picking up clues and speaking to witnesses before moving onto the courtroom to do battle.
It is in the courtroom where the series is at its strongest, and catches the essence of legal drama perfectly. Fast music, plot turns and loud cries of “objection” are the order of the day, along with tough puzzles and unique gameplay devices for the player to navigate.
Spending 10 minutes studying the testimony of a witness, examining their emotions and comparing their narrative with the evidence, only to find a tiny hole in their account, and subsequently using it to blow the case wide open, is deliciously satisfying and makes for a highly rewarding experience.
The story behind each case is always involving, the characters always intriguing, and each case last a good few hours, so when they finally wrap up, it delivers a real sense of achievement.
Unfortunately, “Dual Destinies” strong story is also its weakness, as it places a strict linearity on gameplay that at times suffocates proceedings. Due to the complex trials at work, the game has to stick to a strict story, meaning that player choice is often reduced to repeatedly pressing the “A” button to progress through the dialogue that makes up the vast majority of the game, or finding the one correct piece of evidence to present at one moment.
There are no multiple ways to go about a case, or different ways to succeed. It is about finding the right option at the right time, or not progressing at all.
The result is that, while the story is a compelling one, and the game is no doubt fun to play as the gamer solves all the puzzles, it can lead to a feeling of a lack of immersion, as the player can feel merely like a spectator as opposed to an active participant at times.
The great plot, fun characters and superb soundtrack make up for this, meaning that “Dual Destinies” is definitely a title worth taking a look at, but the linearity and narrowness of the gameplay may be too much for gamers hoping for more interactivity and involvement.

Quest to save forgotten US missile sites


  • national-nike-site
    One of the first operational Nike missile sites was in Lorton, Va. Construction began in March 1954, and the site was operational in 1955. (LORTON HERITAGE SOCIETY)
The Nike missiles were a key part of the U.S. national defense system from 1954 to the 1970s. At close to 300 sites around the country, supersonic surface-to-air missiles sat ready to launch, protected by soldiers and German shepherds. Some missiles carried nuclear warheads, even though they were next to homes in cities from Los Angeles to Chicago.
The advent of long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) made the Nike missiles obsolete. Now, the abandoned launch sites are quickly disappearing from view. Some were sold and redeveloped, some repurposed by the military, while others are simply being reclaimed by nature. A base in southwest Ohio is currently for sale to anyone with $279,000. Another is a low-security prison in Virginia. In Pennsylvania, a couple of luxury houses will soon cover a former launch site.
"They're disappearing. Stuff is under walls, it's dug up and houses are built on it, and pretty soon there aren't going to be any of them around," said David Tewksbury, a GIS (geographic information system) specialist at Hamilton College in New York, who hopes to preserve a visual record of the launch sites before they vanish. "If we can keep a record of some of it, that would be pretty cool." [See Photos of the Nike Missile Launch Sites]
Tewksbury presented the early results of his personal preservation project Sunday at the Geological Society of America's annual meeting.
Tewksbury said he is just old enough to remember the reason for the Nike missiles: the threat of a Soviet invasion. But he never knew that he grew up 8 miles from a missile launch site.
Three months ago, Tewksbury's father asked him to research the history of a strawberry festival in Wayland, Mass., his hometown. That's when he went down the rabbit hole. A link in his search results led to information about the Wayland missile launch site, a defensive site for Boston. Since then, Tewksbury has combed through hundreds of Google Earth and historic air photos, as well as declassified data and personal accounts posted by Army veterans atnikemissile.org.
"It became like eating chips. I'd see one and go look for more information and find another," Tewksbury told LiveScience. "It's pretty amazing when I look back at it," he said. "The whole East Coast was just essentially a continuous curtain of missile protection."
An expert in compiling complex geographic information into simple, beautiful displays, Tewksbury plans to build a geo-referenced database that allows anyone to research the Nike missile sites through Google Earth. Click on a missile site and a visitor will bring up historic photos and archival information. He intends to give the files to the Nike Historical Society, he said.
The Nike missiles were meant to guard against an attack by Soviet bombers. Each installation had a fleet of missiles and a separate radar site. The missiles were stored in underground bunkers and raised only for maintenance or firing.
"In Cleveland, it was right there in the neighborhood, the kids were probably playing baseball right there, and if they hit it over the fence, [perhaps] the soldiers would throw it back over," Tewksbury said. "In Chicago, they were part of the landscape, they were part of the neighborhood."

This Halloween, beware the quants!


  • nosferatu movie.jpeg
    A scene from the 1922 classic "Nosferatu" one of the earliest depictions of vampires in cinema. But far scarier are the real world fiends out to hunt you down. (FILM ARTS GUILD)
Scarier than the NSA and spookier than the CIA, the quants are out to get you!
Out to quantify you, to be precise, which means following your every move online, with your smartphone, in your car, in the supermarket. For quants, the only things that exist are the things that can be quantified or counted. Quants are mindless, their programs run like viruses, and they can't be stopped with a stake through the heart or a silver bullet.
Should you be worried, and if so, is there anything you can do about them?
Quants are credited with everything from winning the last presidential election to successful multi-million product launches. Some of these Web neophytes like Drawbridge, Flurry, and SessionM claim they can track you on a mobile phone and across multiple devices from tablets to work computers without ever using a "cookie" or standard tracking method. The idea is to get fine-grained details on who you are and deliver personalized ads, search engine results, maps, etc. Run all you like, but you can't hide.
The quants may not react to garlic, but they don't like sunlight. The best defense is transparency.
Of course, these are claims often made by startups looking for investment money, so they should be treated with some skepticism. Nevertheless, quants continue to labor on their algorithms and discover new tricks, and like relentless zombies, they're going to get you eventually.
Although these programs may not react to garlic, they do not like sunlight. So the best defense is transparency, exposing the programs and third parties tracking you to see what's really happening. This past week the folks at Mozilla who are behind the open-source Firefox browser took an important step in that direction by releasing a browser add-on called Lightbeam.
Previously known as Collusion, it works with Firefox and reveals what third-party trackers and programs are sticking to you (or attempting to do you so) as you visit various sites. Go to an online autoparts store, for example, and Lightbeam uncovers more than 10 third parties that are collecting data on you (now they know what a broken-down car I have). After visiting just 17 sites, Lightbeam revealed that I had actually been in touch with 131 third-party sites, providing them with information on my surfing habits--whether I wanted to or not.
Some people see this as the commercial equivalent of the NSA but unfettered by regulation, laws or any oversight whatsoever. For those of us who feel this way, Lightbeam will allow you to block individual sites. After gazing at the frightening graphical spider web Lightbeam creates, simply go to the "list" view and check off the third-party sites you don't trust.
For its part, Mozilla hopes to learn more from the data voluntarily contributed by Lightbeam users about these third-party sites. How prevalent are they? What kind of data do they appear to be collecting? What doesn't work when a third-party program is blocked?
If you want a more lethal, final way of blocking all the known tracking and marketing firms, there's Ghostery. It's a free add-on that works with all the major browsers. Tap on an icon at the top of your browser and Ghostery will give you a chilling list of all the sites tracking you on the page you're visiting. You can block all of them, or select those you find particularly scary.
One problem with blocking every site or program that follows you around the Web is that you can inadvertently disable some useful services. For example, many Web site videos won't work with Ghostery in full vampire-killing mode. And social sharing widgets are usually disabled. The program will allow you pause blocking when you run into trouble.
How much you should worry about all this commercial cyber spying isn't clear yet. Many of these companies are overhyping what they can do and the level of precision they can achieve. Statistical modeling and algorithms do not a make for very accurate digital eavesdropping tools (yet).
"We're building a guesswork economy," explains Alex Fowler, Mozilla's privacy officer. He notes that a lot of the best and brightest programmers are going into the adtech and digital marketing business. What we need, though, is a better way of engaging consumers and citizens directly to find out what we really want -- and where to draw the lines on privacy and security.
Until that happens, this Halloween I'm going to forget about zombies and Miley Cyrus. I'm going as a quant.

Barnes & Noble releases new Nook e-reader for $119


  • Nook GlowLight.jpg
    A woman reads on the latest ereader from Barnes & Noble.
  • Nook GlowLight 3.jpg
    The Nook GlowLight. (BARNES & NOBLE)
  • Nook GlowLight 2.jpg
    A woman reads on the latest ereader from Barnes & Noble. (BARNES & NOBLE)
Barnes & Noble Inc. is releasing a new Nook e-book reader for the holidays, while it evaluates the future of tablet computers.
Nook tablets haven't sold well amid intense competition with Apple's iPad, Amazon's Kindle Fire and others. Barnes & Noble had a slim 2 percent share of the worldwide tablet market in the fourth quarter of 2012, but fell off IDC's top 5 list this year.
The company said it isn't giving up on tablets, but it will focus on a new e-reader this year while continuing to sell last year's tablet models. The move comes as research firm IDC says the market for dedicated electronic-book readers is declining. Instead, consumers have been more interested in tablets, which can do much more, including video, email, Facebook and games.
Barnes & Noble's new e-reader, Nook GlowLight, is available in its retail stores and online starting Wednesday for $119, the same as the standard model of Amazon.com Inc.'s Kindle Paperwhite reader. At 6.2 ounces, the GlowLight is 15 percent lighter than the Paperwhite. It's also ad-free, while Amazon charges $20 more for a Paperwhite without ads on its screensaver or home screen.
Barnes & Noble officials say the new e-reader's design is based partly on feedback received at the company's retail stores, where Nook devices are prominently displayed. Consumers' suggestions led to a brighter screen on the brightest setting and more durability in the form of a rubber-like silicone edge, which also provides comfort in the hands. In addition, the frame is white, not black, to match the screen color.
Jonathan Shar, general manager for emerging digital content at Barnes & Noble, said that even as attention has turned to tablets, e-readers are still popular for long-form reading. The GlowLight has an electronic ink touch screen, which has better battery life and less glare than typical tablet screens.
Unlike Kindles, which are tied to Amazon's bookstore, Nook devices are compatible with books bought at other stores that use the EPub standard, including Apple's iBookstore.
The new Nook device replaces the $99 Nook Simple Touch GlowLight model from last year. Barnes & Noble will still sell the $79 Simple Touch e-reader, without the built-in reading light, and Nook HD tablets with screens measuring 7 and 9 inches diagonally. The smaller tablet starts at $129 and the larger one at $149.
Nook's future had come into question after Barnes & Noble said in June that it would stop making its own Nook color touch-screen tablets and would farm out manufacturing to a third-party.
But its CEO left a few weeks later, and the company said instead it was reviewing its Nook strategy. Michael Huseby, the head of the company's Nook business, said in August that the 4-year-old Nook business has had some success, with 10 million devices sold and a 22 percent share in the e-book market. But he acknowledged the company had been overly optimistic about demand.
In an interview this week, Mahesh Veerina, chief operating officer for the company's Nook Media business, said Barnes & Noble will be looking to make devices that enhance the reading experience, as opposed to building an all-purpose device.
"We are evaluating our road map and product plan," he said. "We don't want to play in this general tablet market and compete with everybody."

Top 10 touch-friendly gloves

By Michael Andronico for Laptopmagazine.com
Staying warm through winter is key, but for tech junkies, keeping connected to your favorite devices is even more important. While texting addicts once had to remove their gloves and face the season’s bitter chill just to send a message, some phones such as the Galaxy Note 3 allow you to text through cloth. However, if your phone doesn’t have this feature, there are now a plethora of winter gloves that will interact just fine with a touchscreen. Whether you’re a professional snowboarder or are seeking the finest in snow-season fashion, you’ll probably find something to like in our breakdown of the best tech-friendly gloves.

Hammacher Call Me Gloves ($79)
Being able to take a call with your gloves on is great, but what if you could do so without even touching your phone? That's Hammacher's aim with the new $79 men's and women'sCall Me gloves, which pair wirelessly with your device via Bluetooth. With a speaker in the left thumb and microphone in the left pinky, all you need to do is make the classic "call me" gesture to use your glove as a makeshift cell phone.
The left glove has buttons for answering and ending calls, and the set supports an estimated 12 hours of talk time after charging via the included USB adapter. You may look like you're talking to an imaginary friend when using these black acrylic gloves, but at least your device won't catch frostbite.
Source: Hammacher